Canon S200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Canon S200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013

Canon S200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Canon S200 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.

The S200 was introduced 8 months after the WG-3 GPS so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the S200 grades vs the WG-3 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon S200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 and Pentax WG-3 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
S200 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2013 | Newer by 8 months |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Canon S200
WG-3 GPS | S200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
S200 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Canon S200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon S200 has outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S200 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the S200 against the WG-3 GPS.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S200 and WG-3 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and WG-3 GPS.
Clearly, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S200 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will offer extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer S200 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon S200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S200 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Pentax |
Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2014-02-21 | 2013-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 181 grams (0.40 pounds) | 238 grams (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | 240 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6LH | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $293 | $350 |