Canon S95 vs Canon SX200 IS
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
Canon S95 vs Canon SX200 IS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Succeeded the Canon S90
- Refreshed by Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched May 2009
- Refreshed by Canon SX210 IS
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon S95 vs Canon SX200 IS Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Canon S95 and Canon SX200 IS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Canon. The resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the SX200 IS (12MP) is very well matched but the S95 (1/1.7") and SX200 IS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S95 was revealed 19 months later than the SX200 IS making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the S95 scores vs the SX200 IS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S95 vs Canon SX200 IS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S95 and Canon PowerShot SX200 IS. The full galleries are provided at Canon S95 Gallery and Canon SX200 IS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Canon SX200 IS
| S95 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2010 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 19 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Canon S95
| SX200 IS | S95 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S95 and Canon SX200 IS
| S95 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon S95 vs Canon SX200 IS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Canon S95 has external measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Canon SX200 IS has specifications of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Canon S95 and Canon SX200 IS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the S95 versus the SX200 IS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S95 and SX200 IS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Canon SX200 IS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The visual here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S95 and SX200 IS.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S95 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Canon SX200 IS will give greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger S95 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon S95 vs Canon SX200 IS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon S95 vs Canon SX200 IS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Canon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-11-23 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 28-336mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.4-5.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 0cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 15 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/3200 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195g (0.43 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-6L | NB-5L |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC |
| Card slots | - | Single |
| Cost at launch | $495 | $329 |