Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
![Canon PowerShot S95 front Canon PowerShot S95 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-S95/Canon-S95-front.jpg)
![FujiFilm FinePix T200 front FujiFilm FinePix T200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200/FujiFilm-T200-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Introduced November 2010
- Earlier Model is Canon S90
- Successor is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix T205
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Canon S95 and FujiFilm T200, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and T200 (14MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and T200 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The S95 was introduced very close to the T200 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the S95 scores versus the T200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S95 and FujiFilm FinePix T200. The whole galleries are provided at Canon S95 Gallery and FujiFilm T200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the FujiFilm T200
S95 | T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Canon S95
T200 | S95 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S95 and FujiFilm T200
S95 | T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2010 | ![]() | January 2011 | Similar generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon S95 comes with outer dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the FujiFilm T200 has dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Canon S95 and FujiFilm T200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the S95 compared to the T200.
![Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 size comparison Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S95-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S95 and T200 is 93 and 94 respectively.
![Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 top view buttons comparison Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S95-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The picture below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S95 and T200.
To sum up, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S95 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the FujiFilm T200 will give you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
![Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 sensor size comparison Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S95-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S95-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Canon S95 vs FujiFilm T200 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S95 | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot S95 | FujiFilm FinePix T200 |
Also called | - | FinePix T205 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-11-23 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.4-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.50 m | 2.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 153 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 180 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-45A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD / SDHC |
Storage slots | - | Single |
Cost at launch | $495 | $160 |