Clicky

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport

Portability
93
Imaging
34
Features
42
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S95 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs

Canon S95
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
  • Introduced November 2010
  • Previous Model is Canon S90
  • Replacement is Canon S100
Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon S95 versus Kodak Sport, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the Sport (12MP) is relatively similar but the S95 (1/1.7") and Sport (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The S95 was released at a similar time to the Sport so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the S95 grades vs the Sport in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

				

Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Kodak Sport

 S95 Sport 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution461k112kSharper screen (+349k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Canon S95

 Sport S95 

Common features in the Canon S95 and Kodak Sport

 S95 Sport 
AnnouncedNovember 2010January 2011Similar generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Canon S95 has outer measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Kodak Sport has specifications of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).

Check out the Canon S95 versus Kodak Sport in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S95 vs the Sport.

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S95 and Sport is 93 and 92 respectively.

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport top view buttons comparison

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S95 and Sport.

To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S95 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Kodak Sport will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport sensor size comparison

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S95 Portrait photography info
Kodak Sport Portrait photography info
40
you can focus manually
high flash sync speed (1/500s)
supports RAW formats
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
26
features face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon S95
Street photography with Kodak Sport
65
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
52
weather proof
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
low max ISO (1,250)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon S95
Sports photography with Kodak Sport
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max fps low (1.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
23
weather proof
can't change focal length (35mm)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Canon S95 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak Sport as a Travel photography camera
64
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
does not have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
57
weather proof
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon S95 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak Sport as a Landscape photography camera
52
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
does not have Timelapse mode
27
weather proof
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.4")
no manual control
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,250)
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S95 Vlogging highlights
Kodak Sport Vlogging highlights
32
rather wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone port
25
features face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
Photography Glossary

Canon S95 vs Kodak Sport Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S95 and Kodak Sport
 Canon PowerShot S95Kodak EasyShare Sport
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot S95 Kodak EasyShare Sport
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2010-11-23 2011-01-04
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 4 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 1250
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-105mm (3.8x) 35mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.0
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.4 inch
Display resolution 461k dots 112k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 6.50 m 2.40 m (@ ISO 360)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/500 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 195g (0.43 pounds) 175g (0.39 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 47 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 153 not tested
Other
Battery model NB-6L 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots - 1
Price at release $495 $155