Clicky

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S95 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Canon S95
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
  • Announced November 2010
  • Previous Model is Canon S90
  • Replacement is Canon S100
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Here is a extended assessment of the Canon S95 and Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and VR-340 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The S95 was unveiled 13 months before the VR-340 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the S95 grades against the VR-340 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus VR-340

 S95 VR-340 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen resolution461k460kCrisper screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Canon S95

 VR-340 S95 
ReleasedJanuary 2012November 2010Fresher by 13 months

Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus VR-340

 S95 VR-340 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon S95 enjoys outer measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check out the Canon S95 and Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the S95 vs the VR-340.

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S95 and VR-340 is 93 and 96 respectively.

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S95 and VR-340.

As you can see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S95 with its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus VR-340 will provide extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older S95 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S95 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography advice
41
you can focus manually
high flash sync (1/500 seconds)
supports RAW files
no external flash support
low MP (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
34
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon S95 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Street photography camera
65
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
small sensor (1/1.7")
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (125 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon S95 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography highlights
27
image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon S95
Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
64
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than others (125 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Canon S95 Landscape photography details
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography details
53
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low MP (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of Time Lapse recording
43
decently wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S95 Vlogging highlights
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging highlights
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Optical)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
33
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
lighter than others (125g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S95 and Olympus VR-340
 Canon PowerShot S95Olympus VR-340
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot S95 Olympus VR-340
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-11-23 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 4 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-105mm (3.8x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.0-5.7
Macro focus range 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 461k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 6.50 m 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/500s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 195g (0.43 lbs) 125g (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 47 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 153 not tested
Other
Battery model NB-6L LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots - 1
Retail cost $495 $130