Olympus 6010 vs Sony H200
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus 6010 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Revealed January 2013
Olympus 6010 vs Sony H200 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Olympus 6010 vs Sony H200, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and H200 (20MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 6010 was introduced 4 years before the H200 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the 6010 scores vs the H200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 6010 vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Sony H200
6010 | H200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus 6010
H200 | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | July 2009 | More recent by 42 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Sony H200
6010 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 6010 features outside measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") along with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6010 vs Sony H200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the 6010 compared to the H200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the 6010 and H200 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 6010 and H200.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sony H200 to offer you extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older 6010 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 6010 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6010 vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-17 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 2920 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 20cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.80 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 179g (0.39 pounds) | 530g (1.17 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Battery style | - | AA |
Battery ID | LI-50C | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $250 |