Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1e35/d1e35d4db08406192ef5259cbc0a65a35d691288" alt="Canon PowerShot S95 front Canon PowerShot S95 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/999d5/999d5267cbeeded12e1c296ab2c2e623b4be3f06" alt="Samsung WB150F front Samsung WB150F front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Announced November 2010
- Earlier Model is Canon S90
- Successor is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Canon S95 and Samsung WB150F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and WB150F (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The S95 was announced 13 months prior to the WB150F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the S95 grades against the WB150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S95 and Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are provided at Canon S95 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Samsung WB150F
S95 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Canon S95
WB150F | S95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | November 2010 | Newer by 13 months |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Samsung WB150F
S95 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon S95 has got outer dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S95 and Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the S95 vs the WB150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83d58/83d58c5ba1a382c0bf4fc10c3fc61d6e5786125c" alt="Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the S95 and WB150F is 93 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8868/d88684562f72f1698181afb0bb02e6e0d0e7ca9a" alt="Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison"
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The picture below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S95 and WB150F.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S95 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB150F will give more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged S95 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3aac/a3aac933c2db72cd7a0f330f230729eee99f9500" alt="Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison"
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8d31/a8d31eb4a002b0d05bebfdb50271151709880560" alt="Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Canon PowerShot S95 | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
Model type | Canon PowerShot S95 | Samsung WB150F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-11-23 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.50 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/500s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 195g (0.43 pounds) | 188g (0.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 153 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NB-6L | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | - | Single |
Pricing at release | $495 | $230 |