Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900
87 Imaging
33 Features
28 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5449d/5449d1725b33587a2c704c04960d49cf97de1372" alt="Canon PowerShot SX120 IS front Canon PowerShot SX120 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfe9f/bfe9f9dfbd953cb8bdda2628eee0041960095db6" alt="Nikon Coolpix A900 front Nikon Coolpix A900 front"
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-360mm (F2.8-4.3) lens
- 285g - 111 x 71 x 45mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Launched February 2016
- Newer Model is Nikon A1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Canon SX120 IS versus Nikon A900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Nikon. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the SX120 IS (10MP) and A900 (20MP) and the SX120 IS (1/2.5") and A900 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SX120 IS was launched 7 years earlier than the A900 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SX120 IS matches up against the A900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX120 IS & Nikon Coolpix A900. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX120 IS Gallery & Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX120 IS over the Nikon A900
SX120 IS | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Canon SX120 IS
A900 | SX120 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 79 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX120 IS and Nikon A900
SX120 IS | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX120 IS has physical dimensions of 111mm x 71mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 285 grams (0.63 lbs) and the Nikon A900 has specifications of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX120 IS versus Nikon A900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SX120 IS compared to the A900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88ce0/88ce09e6dcb3541885a2304660389492c81f2065" alt="Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 size comparison Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX120 IS and A900 is 87 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8121/c81212a168a1d9a5674cf789650bf14fc9479392" alt="Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 top view buttons comparison Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The pic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX120 IS and A900.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SX120 IS due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Nikon A900 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged SX120 IS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26ddb/26ddb5c4ba44e2ff6d4628fdede15740c53cf5a7" alt="Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 sensor size comparison Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/505f2/505f2839c93e4df92860d7c4054e468c80c8eb98" alt="Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX120 IS vs Nikon A900 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX120 IS | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Nikon |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX120 IS | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-08-19 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-360mm (10.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.3 | f/3.4-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 160 x 120 (15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 285 gr (0.63 lbs) | 289 gr (0.64 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 71 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus, HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $249 | $400 |