Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af213/af21359bdfa4f28ab8b439e5e28d6933f307906a" alt="Canon PowerShot SX160 IS front Canon PowerShot SX160 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c919/1c9190b66ae9d20e63ea1a028964e79ad2a5586f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Revealed June 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX150 IS
- New Model is Canon SX170 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The resolution of the SX160 IS (16MP) and the EX-ZR700 (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SX160 IS was announced 5 months after the EX-ZR700 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SX160 IS grades against the EX-ZR700 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS & Casio Exilim EX-ZR700. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX160 IS Gallery & Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Casio EX-ZR700
SX160 IS | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Canon SX160 IS
EX-ZR700 | SX160 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Casio EX-ZR700
SX160 IS | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX160 IS features exterior measurements of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR700 has sizing of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SX160 IS versus the EX-ZR700.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd826/bd826444a210d055728c5ec5559d84cb91c3cea7" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 size comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX160 IS and EX-ZR700 is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f0f8/4f0f8a0a5f6ffac74affcc873ae4685a8dcda7f2" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 top view buttons comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The image here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX160 IS and EX-ZR700.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos but you will want to consider the age of the cameras into account.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f969c/f969c32e05718f344ed48de72e06607dafb58c3d" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 sensor size comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/592e3/592e3ee1df069d444ea127f0211ca3590948f315" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-06-21 | 2013-01-29 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4 | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 291g (0.64 lbs) | 222g (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 470 photos |
Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $199 | $370 |