Canon SX20 IS vs Casio EX-Z280
65 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon SX20 IS vs Casio EX-Z280 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 600g - 128 x 88 x 87mm
- Released July 2010
- Replaced the Canon SX10 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX30 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Released August 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX20 IS vs Casio EX-Z280 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Canon SX20 IS versus Casio EX-Z280, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the SX20 IS (12MP) and the EX-Z280 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX20 IS was revealed 11 months later than the EX-Z280 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX20 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-Z280 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the SX20 IS grades versus the EX-Z280 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX20 IS vs Casio EX-Z280 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX20 IS & Casio Exilim EX-Z280. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX20 IS Gallery & Casio EX-Z280 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX20 IS over the Casio EX-Z280
| SX20 IS | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 11 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Canon SX20 IS
| EX-Z280 | SX20 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Canon SX20 IS and Casio EX-Z280
| SX20 IS | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Canon SX20 IS vs Casio EX-Z280 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX20 IS features outer measurements of 128mm x 88mm x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z280 has sizing of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX20 IS versus Casio EX-Z280 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the SX20 IS compared to the EX-Z280.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX20 IS and EX-Z280 is 65 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX20 IS vs Casio EX-Z280 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SX20 IS and EX-Z280.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you have to factor the age of the cameras into account. The younger SX20 IS will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX20 IS vs Casio EX-Z280 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX20 IS vs Casio EX-Z280 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2009-08-31 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 26-104mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.80 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 128 x 88 x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-80 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC / MMC / MMC Plus / HC MMC Plus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $180 |