Canon SX20 IS vs Nikon S9300
Portability
65 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
65 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Canon SX20 IS vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
Canon SX20 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 600g - 128 x 88 x 87mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Older Model is Canon SX10 IS
- Replacement is Canon SX30 IS
Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched July 2012
- Older Model is Nikon S9100
- Later Model is Nikon S9500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX20 IS vs Nikon S9300 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Canon SX20 IS vs Nikon S9300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Canon and Nikon. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the SX20 IS (12MP) and S9300 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX20 IS was brought out 24 months prior to the S9300 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX20 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9300 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the SX20 IS scores against the S9300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX20 IS vs Nikon S9300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX20 IS & Nikon Coolpix S9300. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX20 IS Gallery & Nikon S9300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX20 IS over the Nikon S9300
| SX20 IS | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Canon SX20 IS
| S9300 | SX20 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2012 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX20 IS and Nikon S9300
| SX20 IS | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Canon SX20 IS vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX20 IS provides external dimensions of 128mm x 88mm x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Nikon S9300 has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX20 IS vs Nikon S9300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the SX20 IS compared to the S9300.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX20 IS and S9300 is 65 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX20 IS vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through specifications. The visual underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SX20 IS and S9300.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon S9300 to show greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older SX20 IS will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon SX20 IS vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX20 IS Portrait photography highlights
Nikon S9300 Portrait photography highlights
focusing manually
above average flash sync (1/500s)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Canon SX20 IS Street photography information
Nikon S9300 Street photography information
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than average in class (600g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (215 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX20 IS
Sports photography with Nikon S9300
amazing zoom range (28-560mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (200 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Canon SX20 IS as a Travel photography camera
Nikon S9300 as a Travel photography camera
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
quite wide (28mm)
very long zoom (560mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (600g)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lighter than competitors (215 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
missing Time Lapse function
not so great battery life (200 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX20 IS
Landscape photography with Nikon S9300
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5 inch)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
not so great battery life (200 shots)
missing Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX20 IS Vlogging highlights
Nikon S9300 Vlogging highlights
quite wide (28mm)
display is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
heavier than average in class (600 grams)
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (215 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external mic support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX20 IS vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2012-07-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 6.9 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/500 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600g (1.32 lb) | 215g (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 128 x 88 x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC / MMC / MMC Plus / HC MMC Plus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $500 | $249 |