Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z33
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z33 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Announced August 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z33 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z33, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the EX-Z33 (10MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was unveiled 3 months prior to the EX-Z33 so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the SX200 IS matches up against the EX-Z33 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z33 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Casio Exilim EX-Z33. The full galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Casio EX-Z33 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-Z33
| SX200 IS | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Canon SX200 IS
| EX-Z33 | SX200 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-Z33
| SX200 IS | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2009 |  | August 2009 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z33 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS comes with physical measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z33 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z33 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the SX200 IS versus the EX-Z33.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and EX-Z33 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z33 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and EX-Z33.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Canon SX200 IS to show more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z33 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z33 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2009-08-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 2.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 106 grams (0.23 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $120 |
