Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M5 II was manufactured 2 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M5 II scores against the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M5 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | December 2012 | More recent by 26 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 II
XZ-2 iHS | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M5 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 II offers outside measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M5 II and the XZ-2 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and XZ-2 iHS is 80 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The graphic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 II will provide greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 II will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 340 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $699 | $450 |