Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Z35
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
95 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Launched July 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Z35 Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Z35, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) is very close and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX200 IS was manufactured 2 months earlier than the Fujifilm Z35 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the SX200 IS matches up vs the Fujifilm Z35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Z35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Fujifilm FinePix Z35. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Fujifilm Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Fujifilm Z35
| SX200 IS | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Canon SX200 IS
| Fujifilm Z35 | SX200 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Fujifilm Z35
| SX200 IS | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2009 | July 2009 | Same generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Z35 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS has physical measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Fujifilm Z35 has measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Z35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the SX200 IS versus the Fujifilm Z35.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and Fujifilm Z35 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Z35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and Fujifilm Z35.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Canon SX200 IS to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Z35 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 3 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $329 | $130 |