Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M580
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Successor is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Announced July 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M580 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M580, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the M580 (14MP) is relatively similar and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX200 IS was announced 2 months before the M580 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SX200 IS scores against the M580 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M580 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Kodak EasyShare M580. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Kodak M580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak M580
| SX200 IS | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Canon SX200 IS
| M580 | SX200 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak M580
| SX200 IS | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2009 |  | July 2009 | Similar generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M580 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Canon SX200 IS provides outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Kodak M580 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M580 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS versus the M580.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and M580 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M580 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The visual here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and M580.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Kodak M580 to offer more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M580 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M580 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare M580 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare M580 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2009-07-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $169 |