Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P520
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
66 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Successor is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 550g - 125 x 84 x 102mm
- Released January 2013
- Old Model is Nikon P510
- Successor is Nikon P530
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P520 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon P520, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Canon and Nikon. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and P520 (18MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was launched 4 years prior to the P520 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Nikon P520 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SX200 IS scores versus the P520 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P520 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Nikon Coolpix P520. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Nikon P520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Nikon P520
| SX200 IS | P520 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P520 over the Canon SX200 IS
| P520 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 45 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon P520
| SX200 IS | P520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P520 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS provides external dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Nikon P520 has measurements of 125mm x 84mm x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon P520 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX200 IS vs the P520.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and P520 is 90 and 66 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P520 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading specs. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and P520.
All in all, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon P520 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P520 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P520 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix P520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix P520 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-1000mm (41.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Optional |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 550 grams (1.21 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 125 x 84 x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | EN-EL5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $329 | $380 |