Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P7800
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P7800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Updated by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Introduced November 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P7800 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Canon SX200 IS versus Nikon P7800, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the P7800 (12MP) is very well matched but the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and P7800 (1/1.7") have totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX200 IS was brought out 5 years prior to the P7800 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SX200 IS grades vs the P7800 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P7800 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Nikon Coolpix P7800. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Nikon P7800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Nikon P7800
| SX200 IS | P7800 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Canon SX200 IS
| P7800 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 | May 2009 | Newer by 55 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon P7800
| SX200 IS | P7800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P7800 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX200 IS has got exterior dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Nikon P7800 has sizing of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") along with a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX200 IS versus Nikon P7800 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS against the P7800.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and P7800 is 90 and 82 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P7800 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The image here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and P7800.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same megapixels but not the same sensor dimensions. The SX200 IS offers the tinier sensor which will make obtaining bokeh more challenging. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P7800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon P7800 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix P7800 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2013-11-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.0-4.0 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 921k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 10.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Optional |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 399 grams (0.88 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 54 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 200 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | EN-EL14 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $329 | $550 |