Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-3
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- New Model is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
Photography Glossary Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Canon SX200 IS versus Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX200 IS was revealed 7 years prior to the SH-3 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SX200 IS matches up vs the SH-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The full galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Olympus SH-3
| SX200 IS | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Canon SX200 IS
| SH-3 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 82 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus SH-3
| SX200 IS | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS has got physical measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
See the Canon SX200 IS versus Olympus SH-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS and the SH-3.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and SH-3 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The graphic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and SH-3.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to offer you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2016-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $579 |