Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX200 IS was unveiled 5 years prior to the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SX200 IS grades against the TG-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SX200 IS | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Canon SX200 IS
| TG-2 iHS | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 50 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SX200 IS | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX200 IS comes with exterior measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX200 IS and Olympus TG-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the SX200 IS versus the TG-2 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and TG-2 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and TG-2 iHS.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same MP and you should expect similar quality of photographs although you should really factor the release date of the products into consideration. The older SX200 IS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX200 IS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $329 | $380 |