Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh CX3
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Canon SX200 IS versus Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX200 IS was unveiled 13 months prior to the CX3 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SX200 IS scores versus the CX3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Ricoh CX3
| SX200 IS | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Canon SX200 IS
| CX3 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Ricoh CX3
| SX200 IS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS features outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX200 IS versus Ricoh CX3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the SX200 IS and the CX3.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and CX3 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and CX3.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Canon SX200 IS to resolve extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX200 IS vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 206g (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $329 | $329 |