Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-Z35
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Previous Model is Canon SX210 IS
- Refreshed by Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-Z35, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the SX230 HS (12MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX230 HS was manufactured 18 months later than the EX-Z35 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX230 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SX230 HS scores vs the EX-Z35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX230 HS & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX230 HS Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Casio EX-Z35
| SX230 HS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon SX230 HS
| EX-Z35 | SX230 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Casio EX-Z35
| SX230 HS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon SX230 HS offers outside dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z35 has sizing of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the SX230 HS versus the EX-Z35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX230 HS and EX-Z35 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through technical specs. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX230 HS and EX-Z35.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of images however you have to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more modern SX230 HS will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX230 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2010-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 223 gr (0.49 lb) | 124 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-5L | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $99 |