Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replaced the Canon SX210 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX240 HS
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Canon SX230 HS and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SX230 HS (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX230 HS was revealed 4 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SX230 HS matches up against the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX230 HS & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX230 HS Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX230 HS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SX230 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon SX230 HS
| WG-M1 | SX230 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 38 months |
Common features in the Canon SX230 HS and Ricoh WG-M1
| SX230 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX230 HS features outer measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Canon SX230 HS and Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the SX230 HS versus the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX230 HS and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The visual here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX230 HS and WG-M1.
All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to give more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older SX230 HS is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography details
has manual focus
includes face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (223g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
weather proofing
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
maximum ISO low (800)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Canon SX230 HS Sports photography advice
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography advice
great zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (210 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
weather proofing
great battery life (350 per charge)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX230 HS
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-M1
lighter than competition (223g)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
very long reach (392mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery pack (210 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
great battery life (350 shots)
weather proofing
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Canon SX230 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery pack (210 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse mode
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
great battery life (350 per charge)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (1.5 inch)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (800)
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX230 HS
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-M1
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (223 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone support
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX230 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX230 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 223 grams (0.49 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $2,000 |