Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-Z16
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Released February 2012
- Succeeded the Canon SX230 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced September 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon SX240 HS versus Casio EX-Z16, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the EX-Z16 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX240 HS was launched 17 months after the EX-Z16 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX240 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SX240 HS scores versus the EX-Z16 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Casio Exilim EX-Z16. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Casio EX-Z16 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Casio EX-Z16
| SX240 HS | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 | September 2010 | Newer by 17 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 0k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Canon SX240 HS
| EX-Z16 | SX240 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Casio EX-Z16
| SX240 HS | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Canon SX240 HS features external dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z16 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX240 HS versus Casio EX-Z16 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SX240 HS and the EX-Z16.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and EX-Z16 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The pic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX240 HS and EX-Z16.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you will need to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent SX240 HS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2010-09-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | - |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 848 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 848x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $100 |