Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR700
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched February 2012
- Replaced the Canon SX230 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX260 HS
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Canon SX240 HS and Casio EX-ZR700, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Casio. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and EX-ZR700 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX240 HS was unveiled 11 months before the EX-ZR700 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SX240 HS scores against the EX-ZR700 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Casio Exilim EX-ZR700. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Casio EX-ZR700
| SX240 HS | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Canon SX240 HS
| EX-ZR700 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | Fresher by 11 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Casio EX-ZR700
| SX240 HS | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX240 HS provides physical dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR700 has specifications of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX240 HS and Casio EX-ZR700 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX240 HS and the EX-ZR700.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and EX-ZR700 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The visual here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX240 HS and EX-ZR700.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to give you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older SX240 HS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
includes face detection focusing
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography advice
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography advice
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (224 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography details
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography details
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (230 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
features tracking focus
good battery power (470 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Travel photography highlights
Casio EX-ZR700 Travel photography highlights
lighter than competitors in class (224 grams)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
no Timelapse mode
bad battery (230 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
good battery power (470 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (450mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
bad battery (230 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
good battery power (470 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Vlogging camera
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Vlogging camera
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (224g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external microphone support
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic support
Photography Glossary
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-ZR700 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 pounds) | 222g (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | 470 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $370 |
