Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm SL300
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm SL300 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced February 2012
- Succeeded the Canon SX230 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX260 HS
Fujifilm SL300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm SL300 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Canon SX240 HS versus Fujifilm SL300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) is very similar and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX240 HS was brought out 2 months after the Fujifilm SL300 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX240 HS being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm SL300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the SX240 HS matches up vs the Fujifilm SL300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm SL300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Fujifilm FinePix SL300. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Fujifilm SL300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Fujifilm SL300
| SX240 HS | Fujifilm SL300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Canon SX240 HS
| Fujifilm SL300 | SX240 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Fujifilm SL300
| SX240 HS | Fujifilm SL300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | January 2012 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm SL300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX240 HS has got external measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Fujifilm SL300 has dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX240 HS versus Fujifilm SL300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the SX240 HS versus the Fujifilm SL300.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and Fujifilm SL300 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm SL300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and Fujifilm SL300.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Fujifilm SL300 to offer you greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm SL300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm SL300 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
offers face detect focusing
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography information
Fujifilm SL300 Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (224 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competition in class (510g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography info
Fujifilm SL300 Sports photography info
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking focus
max fps low (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery (230 CIPA)
does not have phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX240 HS
Travel photography with Fujifilm SL300
lighter than others in class (224g)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
terrible battery (230 shots)
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
great reach (720mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (510g)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography information
Fujifilm SL300 Landscape photography information
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
terrible battery (230 shots)
lack of Time Lapse function
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging information
Fujifilm SL300 Vlogging information
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (224 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of mic jack
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
heavier than competition in class (510 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX240 HS vs Fujifilm SL300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-02-07 | 2012-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224 grams (0.49 pounds) | 510 grams (1.12 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photos | 300 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-85 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $280 |