Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a70d/9a70daa5e19eaa038ef747e5f40274a4f27f1719" alt="Canon PowerShot SX240 HS front Canon PowerShot SX240 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c378d/c378dd1d27b87b0a840c3383b7475dd39cae096c" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z981 front Kodak EasyShare Z981 front"
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Superseded the Canon SX230 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Revealed July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Canon SX240 HS and Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the Z981 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SX240 HS was launched 20 months later than the Z981 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX240 HS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z981 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SX240 HS scores against the Z981 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Kodak EasyShare Z981. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Kodak Z981 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Kodak Z981
SX240 HS | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 20 months |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 201k | Crisper screen (+260k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Canon SX240 HS
Z981 | SX240 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Kodak Z981
SX240 HS | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS comes with external dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z981 has proportions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX240 HS and Kodak Z981 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the SX240 HS versus the Z981.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc89a/fc89a0c97ec2dd119194d2766300e08078557981" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 size comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and Z981 is 91 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c47f/4c47fb4bfc337e039aaa929ee9a9f9b8e9dfac7a" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 top view buttons comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and Z981.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Kodak Z981 to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer SX240 HS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c12f/4c12f5db6ced70d3ba43ba26e9f6a31d88f9efb1" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 sensor size comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/747b3/747b32f6775df7d55b2e4b5d2eabccf78d450ee7" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Kodak Z981 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z981 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 201k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | 540g (1.19 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6L | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $0 | $299 |