Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon A900
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Old Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Launched February 2016
- Renewed by Nikon A1000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon A900 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Nikon. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and A900 (20MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX240 HS was introduced 5 years prior to the A900 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the SX240 HS matches up against the A900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon A900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Nikon Coolpix A900. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Nikon A900
| SX240 HS | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Canon SX240 HS
| A900 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 49 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Nikon A900
| SX240 HS | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon SX240 HS enjoys outer measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Nikon A900 has sizing of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon A900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the SX240 HS compared to the A900.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and A900 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specs. The visual below might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and A900.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Nikon A900 to offer extra detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older SX240 HS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lb) | 289 gr (0.64 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | 300 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $400 |