Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon S6500
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon S6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Released February 2012
- Succeeded the Canon SX230 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 95 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon S6500 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Canon SX240 HS and Nikon S6500, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Canon and Nikon. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and S6500 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX240 HS was manufactured 11 months before the S6500 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the SX240 HS scores vs the S6500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon S6500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Nikon Coolpix S6500. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Nikon S6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Nikon S6500
| SX240 HS | S6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6500 over the Canon SX240 HS
| S6500 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | February 2012 | More modern by 11 months |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Nikon S6500
| SX240 HS | S6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon S6500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS features exterior measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Nikon S6500 has proportions of 95mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX240 HS and Nikon S6500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the SX240 HS and the S6500.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and S6500 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon S6500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The pic here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and S6500.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Nikon S6500 to produce more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged SX240 HS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon S6500 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX240 HS vs Nikon S6500 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Nikon Coolpix S6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Nikon Coolpix S6500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 lbs) | 250g (0.55 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 95 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $170 |