Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus FE-5020
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Old Model is Canon SX230 HS
- Successor is Canon SX260 HS
Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus FE-5020, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the FE-5020 (12MP) is pretty close and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX240 HS was revealed 2 years later than the FE-5020 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SX240 HS scores against the FE-5020 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Olympus FE-5020. The full galleries are available at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus FE-5020
| SX240 HS | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Canon SX240 HS
| FE-5020 | SX240 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus FE-5020
| SX240 HS | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX240 HS has got outside measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check the Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus FE-5020 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the SX240 HS against the FE-5020.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and FE-5020 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through specs. The photograph below will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX240 HS and FE-5020.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you may want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The more modern SX240 HS will have an edge in sensor tech.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus FE-5020 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
comes with face detection focus
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography advice
Olympus FE-5020 Street photography advice
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (224g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
environment proof
lighter than competitors in class (137 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography advice
Olympus FE-5020 Sports photography advice
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery (230 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
environment proof
low max shutter speed (1/500s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX240 HS
Travel photography with Olympus FE-5020
lighter than competitors (224 grams)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
no Timelapse recording
bad battery (230 CIPA)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competitors in class (137 grams)
environment proof
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography highlights
Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery (230 shots)
no Timelapse recording
rather wide (24mm)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging factors
Olympus FE-5020 Vlogging factors
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (224 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no external microphone socket
rather wide (24mm)
lighter than competitors in class (137 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Alternative name | - | X-935 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lbs) | 137 gr (0.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $160 |