Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-4
- Replacement is Olympus TG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus TG-5, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M5 III was announced 2 years after the TG-5 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M5 III scores vs the TG-5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus TG-5
E-M5 III | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2019 | ![]() | May 2017 | Newer by 30 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-M5 III
TG-5 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus TG-5
E-M5 III | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III enjoys outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus TG-5 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus TG-5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 III vs the TG-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78878/788780a262c8eab45361f41ad8bb66e126dd36d3" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and TG-5 is 80 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e544/5e544d8da8de096d97d16239e75dad174929090b" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specifications. The image below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and TG-5.
Plainly, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will render greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M5 III is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a72d5/a72d52d92602107d573e448d7860281a0914fa70" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3be6/c3be644bd8f17b5edfda0b86b033ec0441334eb8" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2017-05-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lbs) | 250 gr (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 340 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,199 | $449 |