Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
94 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced February 2012
- Succeeded the Canon SX230 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX260 HS
Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX240 HS was manufactured 11 months prior to the TG-630 iHS so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SX240 HS matches up against the TG-630 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SX240 HS | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Canon SX240 HS
| TG-630 iHS | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 11 months |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SX240 HS | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX240 HS provides external measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX240 HS and Olympus TG-630 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the SX240 HS vs the TG-630 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX240 HS and TG-630 iHS is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX240 HS and TG-630 iHS.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you have to factor the age of the cameras into account. The more aged SX240 HS will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-630 iHS Portrait photography features
you can focus manually
offers face detect focusing
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
features face detection focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Street photography information
Olympus TG-630 iHS Street photography information
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (224g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography features
Olympus TG-630 iHS Sports photography features
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking focus
max fps very slow (2.0 fps)
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (230 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
weather sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (220 per charge)
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-630 iHS Travel photography advice
lighter than average (224 grams)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery life (230 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
weather sealing
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
bad battery power (220 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-630 iHS Landscape photography details
you can focus manually
fairly wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
bad battery life (230 per charge)
lack of Timelapse function
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual exposure
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
bad battery power (220 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging info
Olympus TG-630 iHS Vlogging info
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (224 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of microphone port
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX240 HS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $0 | $200 |