Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a70d/9a70daa5e19eaa038ef747e5f40274a4f27f1719" alt="Canon PowerShot SX240 HS front Canon PowerShot SX240 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b58d/9b58d24e94d77abfbd2cb0a982b5a87fc896924f" alt="Ricoh WG-80 front Ricoh WG-80 front"
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Earlier Model is Canon SX230 HS
- New Model is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SX240 HS was brought out 11 years before the WG-80 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SX240 HS matches up vs the WG-80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Ricoh WG-80
SX240 HS | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Canon SX240 HS
WG-80 | SX240 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2022 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 125 months |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Ricoh WG-80
SX240 HS | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX240 HS features physical dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the SX240 HS vs the WG-80.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3dcf/a3dcf2d0f80356e3822d342d42e7e406af999e5d" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SX240 HS and WG-80 is 91 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6507/f650736f40cf9d742ca4f518d535cd7939d2a944" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and WG-80.
Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to provide you with greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged SX240 HS will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ac7e/9ac7ebfec78759ee4edf87205c3ed3c48654064b" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c779/4c779238e9f4221b38a6b5a2232850aeeece4550" alt="Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Ricoh WG-80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Ricoh WG-80 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2022-05-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.70" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 shots | 300 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6L | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $300 |