Canon SX240 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Canon SX240 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Replaced the Canon SX230 HS
- Newer Model is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Released February 2012
- Updated by Sigma DP2 Merrill
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX240 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Canon SX240 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively close but the SX240 HS (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe SX240 HS was brought out very close to the DP1 Merrill which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX240 HS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SX240 HS scores against the DP1 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX240 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
| SX240 HS | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Canon SX240 HS
| DP1 Merrill | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Sigma DP1 Merrill
| SX240 HS | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 | February 2012 | Same age | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon SX240 HS has got external dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Canon SX240 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the SX240 HS against the DP1 Merrill.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and DP1 Merrill is 91 and 82 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and DP1 Merrill.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SX240 HS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will result in greater detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX240 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sigma |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | - |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 pounds) | 330g (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $1,250 |