Clicky

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
44
Overall
39
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z915 front
Portability
91
Imaging
33
Features
18
Overall
27

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs

Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
  • Launched June 2012
  • Old Model is Canon SX240 HS
  • Renewed by Canon SX270 HS
Kodak Z915
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Launched January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the SX260 HS (12MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The SX260 HS was launched 3 years later than the Z915 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the SX260 HS scores vs the Z915 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Kodak Z915

 SX260 HS Z915 
LaunchedJune 2012January 2009More recent by 42 months
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution461k230kClearer screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Canon SX260 HS

 Z915 SX260 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Kodak Z915

 SX260 HS Z915 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX260 HS enjoys outside measurements of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check the Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SX260 HS against the Z915.

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX260 HS and Z915 is 91 and 91 respectively.

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX260 HS and Z915.

All in all, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Canon SX260 HS to result in more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer SX260 HS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 sensor size comparison

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX260 HS
Portrait photography with Kodak Z915
37
has manual focus
has face detection focus
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
19
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Street photography advice
Kodak Z915 Street photography advice
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (231g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
54
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Sports photography advice
Kodak Z915 Sports photography advice
36
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
low fps (2.0 frames/s)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (230 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250s)
max frames per second low (2.0 fps)
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Travel photography information
Kodak Z915 Travel photography information
61
lighter than others (231g)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse function
bad battery pack (230 shots)
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
54
built-in flash
great zoom (350mm)
missing Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon SX260 HS
Landscape photography with Kodak Z915
41
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery pack (230 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.5")
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon SX260 HS
Vlogging with Kodak Z915
34
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (231 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone socket
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon SX260 HS vs Kodak Z915 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX260 HS and Kodak Z915
 Canon PowerShot SX260 HSKodak EasyShare Z915
General Information
Brand Name Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Kodak EasyShare Z915
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-06-04 2009-01-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 5 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 35-350mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focus range 5cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of display 461 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech PureColor II TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200s 1/1250s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 5.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 231 gr (0.51 pounds) 194 gr (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-6L 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $349 $200