Clicky

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
44
Overall
39
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS front
 
Olympus E-500 front
Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs

Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
  • Announced June 2012
  • Superseded the Canon SX240 HS
  • Later Model is Canon SX270 HS
Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Canon SX260 HS and Olympus E-500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the SX260 HS (12MP) and E-500 (8MP) and the SX260 HS (1/2.3") and E-500 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SX260 HS was brought out 6 years after the E-500 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX260 HS being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SX260 HS scores vs the E-500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Olympus E-500

 SX260 HS E-500 
LaunchedJune 2012October 2005More modern by 81 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution461k215kCrisper display (+246k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Canon SX260 HS

 E-500 SX260 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Olympus E-500

 SX260 HS E-500 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon SX260 HS comes with external dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-500 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).

Analyze the Canon SX260 HS and Olympus E-500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the SX260 HS and the E-500.

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX260 HS and E-500 is 91 and 70 respectively.

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The pic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX260 HS and E-500.

As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SX260 HS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Canon SX260 HS will give more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent SX260 HS provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500 sensor size comparison

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX260 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
37
focusing manually
features face detect focus
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
49
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
MP count low (8MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Street photography factors
Olympus E-500 Street photography factors
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (231 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
57
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition (479g)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon SX260 HS
Sports photography with Olympus E-500
36
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (230 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-500 Travel photography highlights
61
lighter than others in class (231 grams)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
not so great battery pack (230 per charge)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
52
lighter than competition (479 grams)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse function
MP count low (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Landscape photography features
Olympus E-500 Landscape photography features
41
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
not so great battery pack (230 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse function
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX260 HS Vlogging information
Olympus E-500 Vlogging information
34
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (231g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
9
can't shoot video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX260 HS vs Olympus E-500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX260 HS and Olympus E-500
 Canon PowerShot SX260 HSOlympus E-500
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Olympus E-500
Also called - EVOLT E-500
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Announced 2012-06-04 2005-10-21
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 5 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 8 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 3264 x 2448
Maximum native ISO 3200 400
Maximum enhanced ISO - 1600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 3
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.5-6.8 -
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Amount of lenses - 45
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.5"
Screen resolution 461 thousand dots 215 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech PureColor II TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.45x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 13.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 231g (0.51 lbs) 479g (1.06 lbs)
Physical dimensions 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-6L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $349 $600