Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung SL102
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 231g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed June 2012
- Old Model is Canon SX240 HS
- Successor is Canon SX270 HS
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Photography Glossary Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SX260 HS (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX260 HS was announced 3 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SX260 HS grades vs the SL102 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX260 HS & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX260 HS Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX260 HS over the Samsung SL102
| SX260 HS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Canon SX260 HS
| SL102 | SX260 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX260 HS and Samsung SL102
| SX260 HS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX260 HS comes with external dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the SX260 HS versus the SL102.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SX260 HS and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The image underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX260 HS and SL102.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Canon SX260 HS to offer you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent SX260 HS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX260 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
has face detect focus
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
features face detect focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Canon SX260 HS Street photography highlights
Samsung SL102 Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (231 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Canon SX260 HS Sports photography information
Samsung SL102 Sports photography information
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (230 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Canon SX260 HS as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors in class (231 grams)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (230 per charge)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
built-in flash
great maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Canon SX260 HS Landscape photography advice
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography advice
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery power (230 CIPA)
no Time Lapse mode
great maximum aperture (f)
no manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX260 HS as a Vlogging camera
Samsung SL102 as a Vlogging camera
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (231g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no mic socket
great maximum aperture (f)
features face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
wide angle not good (35mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX260 HS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX260 HS | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-06-04 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 231 gr (0.51 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $349 | $130 |
