Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-30
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-30, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX1 was brought out 6 years earlier than the WG-30 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the CX1 grades against the WG-30 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX1 and Ricoh WG-30. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Ricoh WG-30
| CX1 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Ricoh CX1
| WG-30 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Ricoh WG-30
| CX1 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh CX1 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the CX1 against the WG-30.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and WG-30 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and WG-30.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-30 to render more detail having its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged CX1 will be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-02-19 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 180 gr (0.40 lb) | 192 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-70 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $299 | $428 |