Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon S32
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon S32 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon S32 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Canon SX270 HS and Nikon S32, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Nikon. The image resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the S32 (13MP) is relatively comparable but the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and S32 (1/3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX270 HS was announced 10 months before the S32 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the SX270 HS grades vs the S32 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon S32 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Nikon Coolpix S32. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Nikon S32 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Nikon S32
| SX270 HS | S32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Canon SX270 HS
| S32 | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | March 2013 | More modern by 10 months |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Nikon S32
| SX270 HS | S32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon S32 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX270 HS provides outside measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Nikon S32 has dimensions of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Canon SX270 HS and Nikon S32 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SX270 HS and the S32.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and S32 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon S32 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and S32.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The SX270 HS with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Nikon S32 will show extra detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged SX270 HS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon S32 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX270 HS vs Nikon S32 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Nikon Coolpix S32 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Nikon Coolpix S32 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2014-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 13MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 30-90mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 pounds) | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | 220 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $284 | $180 |