Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus XZ-10
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX280 HS
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus XZ-10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX270 HS was manufactured 2 months after the XZ-10 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the SX270 HS grades versus the XZ-10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus XZ-10
| SX270 HS | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Canon SX270 HS
| XZ-10 | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus XZ-10
| SX270 HS | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX270 HS comes with outer measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus XZ-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the SX270 HS against the XZ-10.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SX270 HS and XZ-10 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and XZ-10.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos however you really should take the age of the cameras into account.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Portrait photography factors
Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography factors
focusing manually
comes with face detect focus
external flash not possible
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
you can focus manually
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX270 HS
Street photography with Olympus XZ-10
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (233 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (221 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Sports photography information
Olympus XZ-10 Sports photography information
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking focus
slow fps (4.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (210 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Travel photography advice
Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography advice
lighter than competitors (233 grams)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery life (210 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (221 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Landscape photography features
Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography features
focusing manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery life (210 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
you can focus manually
really wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX270 HS
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-10
reasonably wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (233 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic jack
really wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic jack
heavier than competition (221g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2013-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lbs) | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $284 | $428 |