Clicky

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
  • Released March 2013
  • Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
  • New Model is Canon SX280 HS
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Released February 2012
Photography Glossary

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Below is a in-depth comparison of the Canon SX270 HS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The SX270 HS was unveiled 14 months later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SX270 HS matches up versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 SX270 HS GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
ReleasedMarch 2013February 2012More recent by 14 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Canon SX270 HS

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 SX270 HS 
Screen resolution920k461kSharper screen (+459k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 SX270 HS GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX270 HS features exterior dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon SX270 HS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the SX270 HS against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 91 and 69 respectively.

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX270 HS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SX270 HS using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer SX270 HS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX270 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Portrait photography camera
34
you can focus manually
includes face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
74
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
supports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Street photography details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography details
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (233g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
55
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition (550g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Canon SX270 HS as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Sports photography camera
36
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (210 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
48
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon SX270 HS
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
61
lighter than competitors (233 grams)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
no Time Lapse function
not so great battery pack (210 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
59
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
heavier than competition (550g)
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Landscape photography details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography details
41
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
not so great battery pack (210 CIPA)
no Time Lapse function
63
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon SX270 HS
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
34
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (233g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic port
24
relatively wide (24mm)
supports face detection focus
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic support
heavier than competition (550g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX270 HS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Canon PowerShot SX270 HSRicoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Brand Name Canon Ricoh
Model type Canon PowerShot SX270 HS Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2013-03-21 2012-02-02
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 6 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Max aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 461 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 180 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 233 gr (0.51 lb) 550 gr (1.21 lb)
Dimensions 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 images 400 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-6L DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $284 $871