Clicky

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
  • Announced March 2013
  • Superseded the Canon SX260 HS
  • Replacement is Canon SX280 HS
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is very well matched but the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The SX270 HS was brought out 3 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SX270 HS grades vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

				

Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 SX270 HS GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
RevealedMarch 2013March 2010Fresher by 37 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Canon SX270 HS

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC SX270 HS 
Display resolution920k461kClearer display (+459k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 SX270 HS GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX270 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Examine the Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 91 and 85 respectively.

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The photograph here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

To sum up, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SX270 HS due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Canon SX270 HS will resolve greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer SX270 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography factors
34
you can focus manually
comes with face detect focus
can't use external flash
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
36
focusing manually
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
low MP (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon SX270 HS
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (233g)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (355g)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Sports photography information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography information
36
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking focus
low fps (4.0 fps)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery pack (210 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Canon SX270 HS as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
61
lighter than average (233 grams)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
missing Timelapse function
low battery pack (210 per charge)
resolution not great (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
60
lighter than competition (355g)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX270 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Landscape photography camera
41
you can focus manually
quite wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
low battery pack (210 per charge)
missing Timelapse function
47
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon SX270 HS
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
34
quite wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (233 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
missing microphone support
28
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (355 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX270 HS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Canon PowerShot SX270 HSRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Company Canon Ricoh
Model Canon PowerShot SX270 HS Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2013-03-21 2010-03-18
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 6 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 461 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 180s
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 233 gr (0.51 lbs) 355 gr (0.78 lbs)
Physical dimensions 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photos 410 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-6L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $284 $349