Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H400
Portability
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H400 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Launched February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H400 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Sony H400, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the H400 (20MP) is relatively close but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and H400 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 III was launched 6 years after the H400 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 III grades vs the H400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H400 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony H400
| E-M1 III | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 |  | February 2014 | More modern by 73 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| H400 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony H400
| E-M1 III | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III provides external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Sony H400 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Sony H400 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III and the H400.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and H400 is 67 and 62 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The pic below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and H400.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-M1 III has got the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The younger E-M1 III is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography highlights
Sony H400 Portrait photography highlights
has manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
exports RAW files
decent MP (20 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Street photography advice
Sony H400 Street photography advice
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
features touch focus
weather proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than average in class (628g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography factors
Sony H400 Sports photography factors
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
high frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
supports phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20MP)
comes with tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography advice
Sony H400 Travel photography advice
weather proof
has bluetooth
features touch focus
good MP (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
decent MP (20MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (1550mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (628g)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III as a Landscape photography camera
Sony H400 as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proof
two card slots
pretty wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging details
Sony H400 Vlogging details
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic socket
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
has microphone jack
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
more heavy than average in class (628g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2020-02-11 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic IX | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 X 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 628 grams (1.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Dual | Single |
| Launch price | $1,800 | $268 |
