Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-50
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- Successor is Canon SX280 HS
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Canon SX270 HS versus Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX270 HS was released 5 years before the WG-50 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the SX270 HS grades versus the WG-50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Ricoh WG-50
| SX270 HS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Canon SX270 HS
| WG-50 | SX270 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | March 2013 | More modern by 50 months |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Ricoh WG-50
| SX270 HS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS comes with exterior dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX270 HS versus Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the SX270 HS versus the WG-50.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and WG-50 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The pic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and WG-50.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged SX270 HS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
includes face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX270 HS
Street photography with Ricoh WG-50
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (233 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
has image stabilization (Digital)
environment proof
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Sports photography info
Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography info
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
low fps (4.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (210 per charge)
does not have phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
environment proof
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX270 HS
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-50
lighter than competition in class (233g)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery life (210 per charge)
low MP (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
environment proof
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-50 Landscape photography factors
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
low MP (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery life (210 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse function
has manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16MP)
environment proof
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Canon SX270 HS as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (233 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of microphone port
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
has face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX270 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $284 | $280 |