Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38


82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX260 HS
- New Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Released February 2012
- Successor is Sigma DP2 Merrill

Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Canon SX270 HS versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Sigma. The image resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty close but the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.

The SX270 HS was introduced 14 months later than the DP1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SX270 HS scores versus the DP1 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
SX270 HS | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 14 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Canon SX270 HS
DP1 Merrill | SX270 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Sigma DP1 Merrill
SX270 HS | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX270 HS versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX270 HS vs the DP1 Merrill.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and DP1 Merrill is 91 and 82 respectively.

Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SX270 HS and DP1 Merrill.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SX270 HS having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will render more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern SX270 HS should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Sigma |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 6 | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | - |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 233 grams (0.51 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $284 | $1,250 |