Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6a3e/d6a3ec714ec0a4b69aa98e1d00bdd99052cb3b52" alt="Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46cfd/46cfd6b1b2504d733a07dd4a231b6abe09baa859" alt="Sigma SD1 Merrill front Sigma SD1 Merrill front"
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Newer Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Released April 2012
- Superseded the Sigma SD1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Canon SX270 HS versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Canon and Sigma. The image resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX270 HS was manufactured 12 months after the SD1 Merrill so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SX270 HS matches up against the SD1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
SX270 HS | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | ![]() | April 2012 | More modern by 12 months |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Canon SX270 HS
SD1 Merrill | SX270 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Sigma SD1 Merrill
SX270 HS | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX270 HS enjoys outer measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has measurements of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX270 HS versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the SD1 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e30b/1e30bdee18f49575059a04147287db9e763a7544" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX270 HS and SD1 Merrill is 91 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34bdc/34bdcd04235e764357b0ecaa11d3f1c96a0a9c1e" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The image underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and SD1 Merrill.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SX270 HS due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will show greater detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent SX270 HS should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/783a0/783a09140f61399220a29810cdabe5d195fb459f" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28455/28455433c3115e850f9fdd21f179bd815fe70497" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Sigma |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 6 | Dual True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 233g (0.51 lb) | 790g (1.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $284 | $2,339 |