Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W380
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W380 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Canon SX270 HS and Sony W380, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Sony. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the W380 (14MP) is fairly similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX270 HS was introduced 3 years after the W380 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony W380 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the SX270 HS scores vs the W380 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W380 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Sony W380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Sony W380
| SX270 HS | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 | January 2010 | More modern by 39 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W380 over the Canon SX270 HS
| W380 | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Sony W380
| SX270 HS | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W380 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS comes with exterior measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony W380 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX270 HS and Sony W380 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the SX270 HS versus the W380.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and W380 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W380 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The image underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and W380.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony W380 to offer you greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent SX270 HS will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W380 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W380 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 pounds) | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $284 | $44 |