Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus SP-600 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
35
Features
27
Overall
31

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Introduced February 2010
  • Old Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
  • Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-600 UZ, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-300 was released 6 years earlier than the SP-600 UZ which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-300 scores against the SP-600 UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ

 E-300 SP-600 UZ 

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-300

 SP-600 UZ E-300 
IntroducedFebruary 2010January 2005More modern by 61 months
Screen size2.7"1.8"Bigger screen (+0.9")
Screen resolution230k134kClearer screen (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-600 UZ

 E-300 SP-600 UZ 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has got external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus SP-600 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-600 UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 versus the SP-600 UZ.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and SP-600 UZ is 67 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and SP-600 UZ.

As you can tell, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-600 UZ will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Portrait photography camera
48
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
low resolution (8 megapixels)
27
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography features
Olympus SP-600 UZ Street photography features
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
36
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography information
Olympus SP-600 UZ Sports photography information
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
31
excellent zoom range (28-420mm 15.0 x zoom)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Olympus SP-600 UZ Travel photography advice
45
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low resolution (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
51
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
long reach (420mm)
no Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography factors
Olympus SP-600 UZ Landscape photography factors
43
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
small screen (1.8 inch)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
29
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Olympus SP-600 UZ Vlogging highlights
9
lack of video recording
20
quite wide (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
 Olympus E-300Olympus SP-600 UZ
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus SP-600 UZ
Alternative name EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-01-10 2010-02-02
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 400 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 143
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-420mm (15.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.4
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 1/2 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 3.10 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 455g (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $800 $189