Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z950
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Canon SX280 HS versus Kodak Z950, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is fairly close and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX280 HS was brought out 2 years later than the Z950 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the SX280 HS grades against the Z950 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX280 HS Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Kodak Z950
| SX280 HS | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 34 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Canon SX280 HS
| Z950 | SX280 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Kodak Z950
| SX280 HS | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX280 HS has got outside dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has specifications of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX280 HS versus Kodak Z950 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX280 HS versus the Z950.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX280 HS and Z950 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX280 HS and Z950.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of photos however you will want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer SX280 HS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lb) | 243 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $325 | $250 |