Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Introduced March 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX270 HS
Olympus TG-1 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Below is a extended review of the Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX280 HS was unveiled 11 months later than the TG-1 iHS and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the SX280 HS grades versus the TG-1 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX280 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SX280 HS | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | May 2012 | More recent by 11 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Canon SX280 HS
| TG-1 iHS | SX280 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+149k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SX280 HS | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX280 HS features outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the SX280 HS versus the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SX280 HS and TG-1 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX280 HS and TG-1 iHS.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of files although you will want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The more modern SX280 HS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX280 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-1 iHS
focusing manually
offers face detect focus
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
features face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon SX280 HS as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-1 iHS as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (233g)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX280 HS as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-1 iHS as a Sports photography camera
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (210 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery pack (350 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Canon SX280 HS Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-1 iHS Travel photography factors
lighter than competition (233 grams)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
not so great battery pack (210 shots)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery pack (350 CIPA)
environment proof
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
no Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Canon SX280 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-1 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
focusing manually
fairly wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
not so great battery pack (210 per charge)
lack of Timelapse mode
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
better than average battery pack (350 per charge)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Canon SX280 HS Vlogging features
Olympus TG-1 iHS Vlogging features
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (233g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone jack
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no external mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-03-21 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $325 | $399 |