Canon SX40 HS vs Sony A6000
64 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
85 Imaging
65 Features
78 Overall
70
Canon SX40 HS vs Sony A6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-840mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 600g - 123 x 92 x 108mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Older Model is Canon SX30 IS
- New Model is Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 344g - 120 x 67 x 45mm
- Introduced April 2014
- Superseded the Sony NEX-6
- Newer Model is Sony A6300
Canon SX40 HS vs Sony A6000 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Canon SX40 HS versus Sony A6000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Canon and Sony. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the SX40 HS (12MP) and A6000 (24MP) and the SX40 HS (1/2.3") and A6000 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX40 HS was manufactured 3 years prior to the A6000 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX40 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony A6000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX40 HS matches up against the A6000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon SX40 HS vs Sony A6000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX40 HS & Sony Alpha a6000. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX40 HS Gallery & Sony A6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX40 HS over the Sony A6000
SX40 HS | A6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A6000 over the Canon SX40 HS
A6000 | SX40 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2014 | September 2011 | Newer by 31 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX40 HS and Sony A6000
SX40 HS | A6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX40 HS vs Sony A6000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX40 HS has physical measurements of 123mm x 92mm x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Sony A6000 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 344 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX40 HS versus Sony A6000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SX40 HS vs the A6000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX40 HS and A6000 is 64 and 85 respectively.
Canon SX40 HS vs Sony A6000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX40 HS and A6000.
As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SX40 HS due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A6000 will show more detail due to its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SX40 HS will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Canon SX40 HS vs Sony A6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX40 HS vs Sony A6000 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | Sony Alpha a6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Sony |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | Sony Alpha a6000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2014-04-23 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 179 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.7-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | PureColor II VA TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Flash off, auto, fill-flaw, slow sync, redeye reduction, hi-speed sync, wireless control |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 344 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 92 x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") | 120 x 67 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1347 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | 360 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-10L | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous (3-5 shot)) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $330 | $548 |